Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: "Dennis" <marianndkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:27:46 +0100
Hi
I don't think 25500 loops are necessary. Setting VALIDATE14MAX to 272
(256+16) should be sufficient (and much faster)
And allow the use of a 16 byte register for the length and the loop counter?
Because we do not have the money to pay for the CPU's to run ;-)
Best regards
Dennis Kjaer Christensen
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere.
Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 6011 spam-mails
Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails.
Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- References:
- Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: John O'Harrow
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- From: John O'Harrow
- Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- Prev by Date: Re: New function's UpperCase / LowerCase
- Next by Date: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.7.0
- Previous by thread: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- Next by thread: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.6.2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|