Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.8.0
- From: "John O'Harrow" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:02:21 -0000
I've temporarily re-enabled them for testing, but they all pass validation
on my P4. Did you just consider them as failing because of the wrong
function name.
--
regards,
John
The Fastcode Project:
http://www.fastcodeproject.org/
"Dennis" <marianndkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:456f22c4$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi
CharPosRev_JOH_MMX_1_X should have been renamed CharPosRev_JOH_SSE_1_X
(as
detailed earlier in the thread).
I know but it does not make sense to rename a failing function and include
in a release. I had to remove it.
Can you upload 0.8.0 so that I can find the bug
Yes. I have just finished it now. It is uploaded.
The function is in but not enabled and not renamed.
Best regards
Dennis Kjaer Christensen
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere.
Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 6102 spam-mails
Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails.
Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.8.0
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.8.0
- References:
- Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.8.0
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.8.0
- From: John O'Harrow
- Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.8.0
- From: Dennis
- Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.8.0
- Prev by Date: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.8.0
- Next by Date: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.8.0
- Previous by thread: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.8.0
- Next by thread: Re: Fastcode CharPosRev B&V 0.8.0
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|