Re: Fastcode AnsiStringReplace B&V 1.7.1
- From: Jouni Turunen <jouni.turunen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:15:29 +0200
Hi John,
I was experimenting with reducing the size of the function. The {$IFDEF SMALL} reduces the size of the function by a few hundred bytes at a cost of a 5% reduction in speed. I left this in (but undefined) just in case CodeGear think that the function size is too excessive for inclusion in the Highlander RTL.
Yes, but I think that isn't "the Fastcode way" to do it.
We should have two functions so we can run benchmarks
and validations for both of them?
Regards,
Jouni
--
The Fastcode Project: http://www.fastcodeproject.org/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fastcode AnsiStringReplace B&V 1.7.1
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode AnsiStringReplace B&V 1.7.1
- References:
- Fastcode AnsiStringReplace B&V 1.7.1
- From: Jouni Turunen
- Re: Fastcode AnsiStringReplace B&V 1.7.1
- From: Dennis
- Re: Fastcode AnsiStringReplace B&V 1.7.1
- From: Jouni Turunen
- Re: Fastcode AnsiStringReplace B&V 1.7.1
- From: John O'Harrow
- Fastcode AnsiStringReplace B&V 1.7.1
- Prev by Date: Re: Fastcode AnsiStringReplace B&V 1.7.1
- Next by Date: Re: Fastcode AnsiStringReplace B&V 1.7.1
- Previous by thread: Re: Fastcode AnsiStringReplace B&V 1.7.1
- Next by thread: Re: Fastcode AnsiStringReplace B&V 1.7.1
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|