Re: Data alignment code... What goes on?
- From: "Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Dec 2006 17:21:24 -0800
Anders Isaksson wrote:
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:
Anders Isaksson wrote:
It seems to mean 'not'.
Correct. That is C-style syntax.
Although in this case it's some assembler syntax.
Assemblers are free to define operators for such non-assembler-language
-specific expressions, and some prefer to derive from the Pascal set of
operators, others (probably many more) prefer to derive from the C set
of operators, and yet others allow both, or have their own (like GT and
LT for > and < respectively, etc.).
This is not uncommon in such programs. Note that e.g. most resource
compilers only allow C-style expressions, while some others (notably
the Borland ones) also allow Pascal-style expressions. IIRC, the
Borland ones even recognize (or recognized) Pascal-style const
declarations as well as C-style #defines, and can handle limited .inc
and .h files.
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] http://rvelthuis.de/
"Some cause happiness wherever they go; others, whenever they go."
- Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)
.
- References:
- Data alignment code... What goes on?
- From: dk_sz
- Re: Data alignment code... What goes on?
- From: Anders Isaksson
- Re: Data alignment code... What goes on?
- From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
- Re: Data alignment code... What goes on?
- From: Anders Isaksson
- Data alignment code... What goes on?
- Prev by Date: Re: Data alignment code... What goes on?
- Next by Date: Re: Data alignment code... What goes on?
- Previous by thread: Re: Data alignment code... What goes on?
- Next by thread: New CharPosIEx functions
- Index(es):