Re: FastCode RoundToEx
- From: "Dennis" <marianndkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:03:20 +0100
Hi John
<Sorry for that confusion and the time it took you to find it. That change
was deliberate. I like parameters with easy to interpret meanings. I
should have pointed <out the change.
OK
You should have validated the function prior to posting it. We are
discussing RoundToEx and we must respect the function type.
Now with all the misunderstandings cleared up we can focus on the real
question. Is the RoundToEx a healthy improvement to RoundTo? Can we make
RoundToEx even better? Is the TRoundToEXRangeExtended = -20..20 proper? etc.
Best regards
Dennis Kjaer Christensen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FastCode RoundToEx
- From: John Herbster
- Re: FastCode RoundToEx
- References:
- FastCode RoundToEx
- From: Dennis
- Re: FastCode RoundToEx
- From: Dennis
- Re: FastCode RoundToEx
- From: John Herbster
- Re: FastCode RoundToEx
- From: Dennis
- Re: FastCode RoundToEx
- From: John Herbster
- FastCode RoundToEx
- Prev by Date: Re: FastCode RoundToEx
- Next by Date: Re: FastCode Reference Compilers
- Previous by thread: Re: FastCode RoundToEx
- Next by thread: Re: FastCode RoundToEx
- Index(es):