Re: FastMove ?
- From: "John O'Harrow" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:59:09 +0100
FastMove should never be slower than using the standard system move. In
fact, the system move routine uses virtually the same code as used by
FastMove (for processors that do not support MMX, SSE etc). It could be
that just adding FastMove to the project causes memory to be allocated from
a different location (not in level 1/2 cache etc), or causes another routine
to be sub-optimally aligned etc.
How much slower is it, and how are you measuring the move performance?
--
Regards,
John
--
The Fastcode Project: http://www.fastcodeproject.org/
"Sanyin" <prevodilac@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:48032fa2$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"John O'Harrow" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47f4feb6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Version 3.03 (March 2006) is still the latest version.
It can be found at http://fastcode.sourceforge.net/
--
Regards,
John
When using fastmove from pointer obtained by windows memory mapping API,
It is slower than regular move (d7)...
Any reason for this?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FastMove ?
- From: Sanyin
- Re: FastMove ?
- References:
- FastMove ?
- From: Jo Black
- Re: FastMove ?
- From: John O'Harrow
- Re: FastMove ?
- From: Sanyin
- FastMove ?
- Prev by Date: Re: FastMove ?
- Next by Date: Re: FastMove ?
- Previous by thread: Re: FastMove ?
- Next by thread: Re: FastMove ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|