Re: I need the fastest routine

Hello Clément,


"Clément Doss" <cdoss@xxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:487b94ee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
// Prior to Original post
ArrayOrig 334260152 - 4.00000000000000E+0000 9.99999200000000E+0006

Array0 44658696 - 4 9999992
Array1 29846448 - 4 9999992
Array2 27265964 - 4 9999992
Array3 18771676 - 4 9999992
Array4 20511472 - 4 9999992
Array5 105058428 - 4 9999992 // Original post
Array6 64012668 - 4 9999992
Array7 28452764 - 4 9999992
Array8 22176132 - 4 9999992
Array9 32827220 - 4 9999992
Array10 32593756 - 4 9999992
Array11 31900212 - 4 9999992
Array12 32360978 - 4 9999992

I think the values "4 9999992" are uninteresting.
Could you expansion the times for other array-types?
random (the way as now), step-up (0..+x), step-down (o..-x) and zero(0)?

The benchmark we used was not based on RDTSC instruction, but

T0 := Now;
SomeProc
T1 := now;

This thread IS very enlightening.

thx &
mfg.
Herby

--
http://www.hubert.seidel.de


.