Re: General questions

From: Kurt Barthelmess (kbarthelmess_at_compuserve.com)
Date: 10/13/03 

Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 20:33:46 GMT

"Fauschti" <nospam@web.de> wrote:

>Little bit confusing this example <g>

I was trying to provide an example of what (I think) Rob was objecting
to and his (presumed) alternative approach.

>but i still wouldn't call the vars in your example globals ...
>aren't they still local, with the exception that in this case they are also
>accessable by a nested procedure?

I guess that depends on your definition of "global"<g>. In my second
version of the code, "I" (by my definition) is not a "global", but
some might consider it to be "global" relative to PA.

Kurt