Re: About Lists of Pointers
From: John Herbster \(TeamB\) ("John)
Date: 10/28/03
- Next message: Ignacio Vazquez: "Re: Use Array of Function Pointers"
- Previous message: Rob Kennedy: "Re: About Lists of Pointers"
- In reply to: Steve B: "About Lists of Pointers"
- Next in thread: Dimitrij Klingbeil: "Re: About Lists of Pointers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 10:35:33 -0600
"Steve B" wrote
> In Proc1, the address of a local variable is pushed.
> So why is the address still valid in Proc2?
Steve,
As I think that you are aware, the address of the original
"C" variable was on the stack in Proc1 but may be used
for something else in Proc2. If that address still points to
a character value "A" (after you fix the other errors in your
code), then I would say that you could just consider it
"by chance". What are you really trying to do?
Regards, JohnH
- Next message: Ignacio Vazquez: "Re: Use Array of Function Pointers"
- Previous message: Rob Kennedy: "Re: About Lists of Pointers"
- In reply to: Steve B: "About Lists of Pointers"
- Next in thread: Dimitrij Klingbeil: "Re: About Lists of Pointers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|