Re: Octane Controversy
From: Dave Nottage (TeamB) (davidn_at_smartchat.net.au)
Date: 10/04/03
- Next message: Dave Nottage (TeamB): "Re: Borland didn't just reneg on the bundling..."
- Previous message: Kristofer Skaug: "Re: Octane Controversy"
- In reply to: R. Michael Hall: "Re: Octane Controversy"
- Next in thread: Captain Jake: "Re: Octane Controversy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 3 Oct 2003 16:43:48 -0700
R. Michael Hall wrote:
> The blaming and attacks on Borland's customers for having a normal
> customer's response to this, is getting out of hand.
I don't see anyone attacking customers for being concerned about the
changes, mainly because most people here (including TeamB members) are
affected. The reaction that Win32 is taking a back seat is quite normal
and understandable.
What is being objected to are the assumptions, speculations and false
statements being propagated.
-- Dave Nottage (TeamB)
- Next message: Dave Nottage (TeamB): "Re: Borland didn't just reneg on the bundling..."
- Previous message: Kristofer Skaug: "Re: Octane Controversy"
- In reply to: R. Michael Hall: "Re: Octane Controversy"
- Next in thread: Captain Jake: "Re: Octane Controversy"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|