Re: Compiler paradoxes
From: Mike Swaim (mpswaim_at_mdanderson.org)
Date: 10/08/03
- Next message: ckd: "Re: Mini-poll: "Platform"-priorities"
- Previous message: Martyn Ayers: "Re: Compiler paradoxes"
- In reply to: Ronald McDonald: "Re: Compiler paradoxes"
- Next in thread: Clément Doss: "Re: Compiler paradoxes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 15:34:13 -0500
"Ronald McDonald" <ldinters@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3f8466da@newsgroups.borland.com...
> So, if the compiler was written in Borland C++, what was C++ written in?
The first implementations of C++ compiled to C. (And I think that you can
still buy the CFront compiler.) Interestingly, if you choose to compile a
PowerBuilder application to machine code (instead of P-Code), it compiles to
C, and then to machine code.
The first implementation of C was in assembler on a PDP machine.
-- Mike Swaim swaim@hal-pc.org at home mpswaim@mdanderson.org or mswaim@odin.mdacc.tmc.edu at work Disclaimer: Yeah, like I speak for MD Anderson. Quote: "Boingie"^4 Y,W & D
- Next message: ckd: "Re: Mini-poll: "Platform"-priorities"
- Previous message: Martyn Ayers: "Re: Compiler paradoxes"
- In reply to: Ronald McDonald: "Re: Compiler paradoxes"
- Next in thread: Clément Doss: "Re: Compiler paradoxes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|