Re: Delphi for .NET and Win32
From: Dave Nottage (TeamB) (davidn_at_smartchat.net.au)
Date: 10/09/03
- Next message: Dave Keighan: "Re: Just for fun ..."
- Previous message: Eyal: "Re: Delphi for .NET and Win32"
- In reply to: Eyal: "Re: Delphi for .NET and Win32"
- Next in thread: John Pressman: "Re: Delphi for .NET and Win32"
- Reply: John Pressman: "Re: Delphi for .NET and Win32"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 8 Oct 2003 21:34:23 -0700
Eyal wrote:
> > > Since when is a new version not an "update" of an old one?
>
> Since Borland released D6 Update1 and D6 Update2, and seperately, D7.
> In Borland terminology at least, there's a difference between an
> update and a new version.
It depends on the context. Borland would say that Delphi 7 was an
update over Delphi 6, but clearly not an update that would otherwise be
known as a patch.
Please, no "funny" remarks about whether Delphi 7 was a patch <g>
-- Dave Nottage (TeamB)
- Next message: Dave Keighan: "Re: Just for fun ..."
- Previous message: Eyal: "Re: Delphi for .NET and Win32"
- In reply to: Eyal: "Re: Delphi for .NET and Win32"
- Next in thread: John Pressman: "Re: Delphi for .NET and Win32"
- Reply: John Pressman: "Re: Delphi for .NET and Win32"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]