Re: Ordered it!

From: Colonel Tony (tcaduto_at_amsoftwaredesign.com)
Date: 11/09/03 

Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 22:44:27 -0600

I was using version 1.0 of the .net framework and I think that is not as
efficient as 1.1 is.

>Not sure how you got 20 MB, but even starting out with a base of 6-7 MB is
pretty offensive.
> I'd hate to see what a full app would use memory-wise.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: migrating VC6 to VC8
    ... > My MFC project consist of several files that constitute the MFC ... When you compile your existsing code with /clr, you can use .NET framework ... > Even if you have a managed app you can't use it as you can use Java ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vc)
  • Re: Real-World Sample Application?
    ... My experience has been that if an application cost ... VB.NET app would be SQL Server and the back end in the MS Access ... The key to .Net is to know the .Net Framework, using the code in the library and what is in the namespaces of the .Net Framework. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: Web vs Windows Application
    ... my app took several months to write and i was under contract ... client have .net framework cause of large operating system environment. ... i have designed large scale data entry ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: Web vs Windows Application
    ... my app took several months to write and i was under contract ... client have .net framework cause of large operating system environment. ... i have designed large scale data entry ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: (Raising my hand) I dont get it...
    ... Lars wrote: ... I'm a happy VB6 ... have all of those nasty .ddl's to tag with your app. ... really is if the target pc has the .NET framework on it. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)