Re: VCL.NET deprecated long-term ?
From: Captain Jake (johnjac76[nospam)
Date: 12/03/03
- Next message: Christophe Floury: "Re: ECO vs MS Visualisation tools"
- Previous message: Joanna Carter \(TeamB\): "Re: Anyone Else Waiting for Delphi 8 for Win32?"
- In reply to: USCode: "Re: VCL.NET deprecated long-term ?"
- Next in thread: USCode: "Re: VCL.NET deprecated long-term ?"
- Reply: USCode: "Re: VCL.NET deprecated long-term ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:28:54 -0600
"USCode" <USCode@nospam.org> wrote in message
news:3fccee24@newsgroups.borland.com...
> For example, I've developed software for a very large enterprise-software
> maker for 6yrs and one of the things that made the company successful is
the
> fact that they HAD their own proprietary IDE and environment, and continue
> to develop it.
I doubt that THAT is the reason they were successful. It probably just made
it easier to be successful. The real reason is more likely to be WHAT people
can make with that IDE and environment. You could have the most flexible and
amazing IDE and still fail if the IDE doesn't let users make anything that
they are interested in making.
- Next message: Christophe Floury: "Re: ECO vs MS Visualisation tools"
- Previous message: Joanna Carter \(TeamB\): "Re: Anyone Else Waiting for Delphi 8 for Win32?"
- In reply to: USCode: "Re: VCL.NET deprecated long-term ?"
- Next in thread: USCode: "Re: VCL.NET deprecated long-term ?"
- Reply: USCode: "Re: VCL.NET deprecated long-term ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|