Re: Jet another feature
From: Martin James (mjames_falcon_at_dial.pipex.com)
Date: 12/16/03
- Next message: Robert Marquardt: "Re: Jet another feature"
- Previous message: Ignacio Vazquez: "Re: while we're at it (feature request)"
- In reply to: Rudy Velthuis (TeamB): "Re: Jet another feature"
- Next in thread: Jesper Hogstrom [Borland]: "Re: Jet another feature"
- Reply: Jesper Hogstrom [Borland]: "Re: Jet another feature"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 03:59:01 -0000
"Rudy Velthuis (TeamB)" <rvelthuis@gmx.de> wrote in message
news:3fde1e7b$2@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Hrvoje Brozovic wrote:
>
> > Promoting all those (Length, Low, High, Succ, Prev)
> > to operators will help better understanding.
>
> Too many "operators" or other language constructs would be a lot more
> confusing, IMO.
> --
If I wanted more complication, I would use C++ for development & refuse any
maintenance work.
Rgds,
Martin
- Next message: Robert Marquardt: "Re: Jet another feature"
- Previous message: Ignacio Vazquez: "Re: while we're at it (feature request)"
- In reply to: Rudy Velthuis (TeamB): "Re: Jet another feature"
- Next in thread: Jesper Hogstrom [Borland]: "Re: Jet another feature"
- Reply: Jesper Hogstrom [Borland]: "Re: Jet another feature"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|