Re: Why to use Delhi.NET?

From: Brion L. Webster (brion.webster_at_nospam.ci.fresno.ca.us)
Date: 12/23/03 

Date: 23 Dec 2003 09:53:28 -0700

HAlizieri wrote:

> Hello
>
> Can anybody give me some good reasons for starting an application
> for .NET in D8 and do not use C#?

Delphi for .NET can expose a .NET assembly as a Win32 DLL, so your
new .NET code can be reused by people or applications that have not
migrated to .NET. Kind of like unmanaged code in reverse.

-Brion

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Borland vs. VS: Update and GREAT NEWS!
    ... > Aside from the so-called maintainability arguemet, ... I think there's a lot behind your statement "...learning new VB .NET code". ... That was one of our biggest reasons for going Delphi: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??
    ... BizTalk Server 2004 is touted as the worlds largest .NET code base with>1 ... "Jonathan" wrote: ... >> world applications doing real world data handling, so I would qualify that as ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.clr)
  • RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??
    ... BizTalk Server 2004 is touted as the worlds largest .NET code base with>1 ... "Jonathan" wrote: ... >> world applications doing real world data handling, so I would qualify that as ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??
    ... BizTalk Server 2004 is touted as the worlds largest .NET code base with>1 ... "Jonathan" wrote: ... >> world applications doing real world data handling, so I would qualify that as ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.performance)
  • RE: Why no serious MS Application in .NET yet ??
    ... BizTalk Server 2004 is touted as the worlds largest .NET code base with>1 ... "Jonathan" wrote: ... >> world applications doing real world data handling, so I would qualify that as ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)