Re: Borland Layoffs?
From: Captain Jake (johnjac76[nospam)
Date: 12/28/03
- Next message: Sergey M: "Re: Why go to .Net?"
- Previous message: Captain Jake: "Re: Borland Layoffs?"
- Next in thread: Frank Andreas de Groot: "Re: Borland Layoffs?"
- Reply: Frank Andreas de Groot: "Re: Borland Layoffs?"
- Reply: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Borland Layoffs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 17:02:26 -0600
In borland.public.delphi.non-technical, Frank Andreas de Groot
<nospam@abcdefgnospam.biz> wrote in message <3fedfbad$1
@newsgroups.borland.com>...
> a. Optimization of the Floating point output would give a speedup of 1,000%
> there.
That's assuming that they could match the Intel compiler.
> b. Support for AMD64
This will be in .NET so it would be redundant in Win32.
> c. Inline functions
The optimizer often quietly does this for you. In addition, the register
calling convention makes this somewhat moot.
>
> d. UNICODE support
Again, this will be in .NET so it would be redundant in Win32.
>
> e. Some nasty bugs fixed
This is a legitimate concern IMHO.
>
> f. support COFF so that we can link with MS C++
That would have been good years ago. Now it would be too little too late.
-- ***Free Your Mind***
- Next message: Sergey M: "Re: Why go to .Net?"
- Previous message: Captain Jake: "Re: Borland Layoffs?"
- Next in thread: Frank Andreas de Groot: "Re: Borland Layoffs?"
- Reply: Frank Andreas de Groot: "Re: Borland Layoffs?"
- Reply: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Borland Layoffs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|