Re: .Net breaks compatibility
From: Rudy Velthuis (TeamB) (rvelthuis_at_gmx.de)
Date: 01/09/04
- Next message: Pål: "Re: Error list anyone?"
- Previous message: Chris Bell: "Re: .Net breaks compatibility"
- In reply to: Chris Bell: "Re: .Net breaks compatibility"
- Next in thread: Danny Thorpe: "Re: .Net breaks compatibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 9 Jan 2004 04:17:21 -0700
Chris Bell wrote:
> Hmm, not exactly a new platform. You've still got access to the Win32
> API and COM.
Via marshalling, P/Invoke, etc. Not directly. The platform is very
different, and, most important of all, managed.
> Is there technically any reason why the ADO classes couldn't be
> migrated to Delphi 8? I very much doubt it. So the statement "We made
> it as simple as possible. We always have." is not accurate
I guess it is. I guess more was not possible at the moment.
--
Rudy Velthuis (TeamB)
"Be nice to people on your way up because you meet them on your way down."
- Jimmy Durante
- Next message: Pål: "Re: Error list anyone?"
- Previous message: Chris Bell: "Re: .Net breaks compatibility"
- In reply to: Chris Bell: "Re: .Net breaks compatibility"
- Next in thread: Danny Thorpe: "Re: .Net breaks compatibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|