Re: D8 may be 32 bit only

From: Eric Grange (egrange_at_glscene.org)
Date: 03/18/04


Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:57:44 +0100

Nick, you seem to love accusing without even making a basic
google search first.
You'll find below three random google quotes, I'll let you and others
read them, use them as starting point for their google searches,
and judge how much these, and the threads they were taken from,
wouldn't imply that D8 isn't being promoted as the way to Win64
in Delphi, or how much they differ in spirit from my simplification.

<<The only thing he [Danny Thorpe] has said on this subject is:
"Borland has been working for the past three years on developing a Delphi
technology that can be used with AMD64 / IA-32e. We shipped it in
December 2003. It's called Delphi for .NET." (and he repeated part of
this in another message).
Now some may interpret this as a statement that they will never do
anything for native Win64. I only see it as a statement that if you want
your Delphi code to run on 64 bits, you can already do that now, using
D8fN.>>
Rudy Velthuis, 2004-03-03 03:40:21 PST in "Re: Intel announces 64-bit extensions"

<<Why would a 64-bit native Delphi compiler sell /better/ than a .Net
solution for that platform? That's sort of my point -- I don't think
it will, given that .Net will be everywhere on the 64-bit platform.>>
Nick Hodges, 2004-02-21 14:09:39 PST in "Re: Intel announces 64-bit extensions"

<<Borland's current research shows the market isn't large enough to warrant
developing a Win64 compiler according to Danny Thorpe. Unless you have research
showing the size of the developer market and how much of that reasonably would
use Delphi, I'll go with the research done by Borland at this time. They get 64
bit support by default with the .NET version, so you would have to show the need
for a native Win64 compiler that easily offsets the cost of developing such a
product (especially with the WinXx API's being depreciated by MS in favor of
.NET which will be the native API within a few years)..>>
Jeff Overcash, 2003-10-20 06:06:14 PST in "Re: Delphi-apps on 64-bit"

Eric



Relevant Pages

  • Re: VB6, VB2005, or Something Else?
    ... I did a google and found the roadmap article, ... find the evaluation compiler download site though. ... DevCo (as they call the "Delphi IDE" team internally) has committed to ... my code with their development tools. ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: Delphi for free at Google?
    ... If a platform vendor (like Google) acquires the Borland ... C'mon loyal Delphi community! ... api for a price. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
    ... In my experience the documentation for frameworks in Ruby are more complete and consistent than in the Delphi community. ... This is because there is a standard way of producing documentation for code: RDoc. ... With Ruby, the RDoc integration is really nice and the first thing that I look at, but I can google just as easily. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Getting device specific information.
    ... Boston, MA 02116www.penfact.com ... search through the google groups on RAPI Delphi and Ben Daniel. ...
    (microsoft.public.pocketpc.developer)
  • Re: Why arent you upgrading?
    ... How many developers are gung ho on .NET and native Win64? ... and I'm sure TeamB will respond they are all using it). ... limited - combined with how incredibly far behind Delphi is in .NET - ... are not enough resources to do likely even just that - let alone both ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)