Re: Delphi 8 common quality
From: Derek Davidson (derek.davidson_at_REMOVEenterpriseblue.co.uk)
Date: 03/22/04
- Next message: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]: "Re: "Faster, More Powerful . 64 Bits!""
- Previous message: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]: "Re: Delphi 8 common quality"
- In reply to: Rudy Velthuis (TeamB): "Re: Delphi 8 common quality"
- Next in thread: Rudy Velthuis (TeamB): "Re: Delphi 8 common quality"
- Reply: Rudy Velthuis (TeamB): "Re: Delphi 8 common quality"
- Reply: Rudy Velthuis (TeamB): "Re: Delphi 8 common quality"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 22 Mar 2004 10:23:33 -0800
Rudy Velthuis (TeamB) wrote:
> QC is much more
> efficient, and easier to use, since it helps you provide the
> information Borland needs.
'helps'? Some would see it as 'force'. Also, to claim it's easier is
a complete nonsense. Simply writing an e-mail is much easier than
entering into QC.
> And QC provides a persistent, easy to browse list for everyone.
> Newsgroups don't.
Baloney. I, and hundreds of thousands of others have managed very
successfully searching nesgroups and/or Google and/or Tamaracka and/or
(insert your favourite here) for YEARS.
> They are also inefficient for the customer looking
> for reported bugs and their workarounds.
No, they're not. QC is limited to only what customers have reported via
QC. Searching through newsgroups and/or Google (etc - you get the
idea) will net you a far larger search result.
-- Derek Davidson Enterprise Blue http://www.enterpriseblue.co.uk
- Next message: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]: "Re: "Faster, More Powerful . 64 Bits!""
- Previous message: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]: "Re: Delphi 8 common quality"
- In reply to: Rudy Velthuis (TeamB): "Re: Delphi 8 common quality"
- Next in thread: Rudy Velthuis (TeamB): "Re: Delphi 8 common quality"
- Reply: Rudy Velthuis (TeamB): "Re: Delphi 8 common quality"
- Reply: Rudy Velthuis (TeamB): "Re: Delphi 8 common quality"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|