Re: Why do MS want to know about Borland bugs?
From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] (rvelthuis_at_gmx.de)
Date: 06/13/04
- Next message: Khen Chzakuv: "Microsoft ALM Strategy"
- Previous message: Lord Crc: "Re: TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer"
- In reply to: Peter Morris [Droopy eyes software]: "Re: Why do MS want to know about Borland bugs?"
- Next in thread: Leonel: "Re: Why do MS want to know about Borland bugs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 13:05:33 +0200
At 11:25:47, 13.06.2004, Peter Morris [Droopy eyes software] wrote:
> I use madExcept, my app never throws one of these message boxes it
> throws madExcept message boxes instead. I imagine the information is
> much more informative, and more likely to be sent :-)
Indeed, and sent to the author(s), not to MS. <g>
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
"The concept is interesting and well-formed, but in order to earn better
than a 'C', the idea must be feasible."
-- A Yale University management professor in response to student Fred
Smith's paper proposing reliable overnight delivery service (Smith
went on to found Federal Express Corp.)
- Next message: Khen Chzakuv: "Microsoft ALM Strategy"
- Previous message: Lord Crc: "Re: TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer"
- In reply to: Peter Morris [Droopy eyes software]: "Re: Why do MS want to know about Borland bugs?"
- Next in thread: Leonel: "Re: Why do MS want to know about Borland bugs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|