Re: I think Delphi 9 Win32 could be huge success...
From: Kostya Poukhov (kostya_AT_rogers_DOT_com)
Date: 06/16/04
- Next message: Jeff Molloy: "Re: Delphi What if..."
- Previous message: Christopher Latta: "Re: I think Delphi 9 Win32 could be huge success..."
- In reply to: TObject: "Re: I think Delphi 9 Win32 could be huge success..."
- Next in thread: TObject: "Re: I think Delphi 9 Win32 could be huge success..."
- Reply: TObject: "Re: I think Delphi 9 Win32 could be huge success..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:25:48 -0400
> But can you restart your web sites you've been building
> for years without loosing user sessions information?
> Or your web sites are so good, they never need restarting?
It is trivial, session can be persistent and not persistent.
Persistent can be restarted with no problem.
You are talking here about ABC that was passed years ago.
> I agree with you there, but that is a standard protocol
> that is desired by many for compatibility.
So I uses it only in that case. The ability to speak XML
is not limited to .NET.
> More third party. I am allergic to third party.
That is your problem. I mostly use my own libs
but sometimes go to 3rd party for some highly
specialised stuff.
> Is there anything specific in my statement about
> extended threading support in .NET that
> you don't like?
You are talking about it as it is only available for
.NET while in reality it is a trivial part accessible
from nearly any language with plenty of libs
again for advansed features.
> Besides, what's wrong with MS propaganda?
Nothing that is what company supposed to do, but
as an intelligent person you are not supposed
to eat it bluntly. They should work for you/customer,
not the other way
> Borland itself is downsizing the development of
> its own technologies, and concentrating on support
> of Microsoft tools instead.
Again it is Borland's problem, not mine
> Don't you get bored? Wouldn't you like to try
> something new and exciting, as far as programming goes.
> What are you doing programming with Delphi,
> anyway? Wouldn't you fit better with the Cobol crowd?
>
> Just kidding on the last paragraph. Please don't
> take it seriously.
Well you do not know me, do you? I spent half of my life in
science and have developed and dealt with the subjects that are far
more complicated then computer language. After that it is hard to me
to get excited by operator overloading for example.
What excites me is that I am capable of creating products
that are being used for real people's needs and able to
make a living by doing so. When creating product I choose the
technology that gives me most bang for the bug. Currently
.NET is not the candidate.
Kostya
- Next message: Jeff Molloy: "Re: Delphi What if..."
- Previous message: Christopher Latta: "Re: I think Delphi 9 Win32 could be huge success..."
- In reply to: TObject: "Re: I think Delphi 9 Win32 could be huge success..."
- Next in thread: TObject: "Re: I think Delphi 9 Win32 could be huge success..."
- Reply: TObject: "Re: I think Delphi 9 Win32 could be huge success..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
