Re: My longest lived program retired after 22 years.

From: John Kaster (Borland) (johnk_at_borland.com)
Date: 06/21/04 

Date: 20 Jun 2004 21:32:38 -0700

Dennis Landi in <40d633f5$1@newsgroups.borland.com> wrote:

> Are you addressing John's question? I don't believe you are, but I
> was.

Unfortunately, I don't see any way that your answer addressed John's
question. It simply looks like another thread hijacking to me.

If you care to spell out how your concern for a 64-bit Delphi compiler
(support for one future platform) relates to John's question, I'm sure
people here can explain how there are surer ways to guarantee the
compatibility of your Delphi code for future computing platforms. 

-- 
John Kaster, Borland Developer Relations, http://bdn.borland.com
BorCon2004, all info in one place! http://info.borland.com/conf2004
Features and bugs: http://qc.borland.com 
Get source: http://cc.borland.com
Unofficial information overload: http://blogs.borland.com

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [64-bit] optimism
    ... Dennis Landi wrote: ... > optimism. ... > A 64-bit Delphi Compiler now definitely on the Borland Radar Screen. ... "We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time." ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Please *DO* stop 64 bits threads
    ... Dennis Landi wrote: ... > Perhaps there is a subject that Andrea is interested in? ... also read the first posts about 64 bits, ... I wouldn't dislike a 64-bits Delphi compiler, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Wild speculations about the "other" factors
    ... Dennis Landi wrote: ... Delphi compiler. ... We have no evidence whatsoever that any such work is ... Publically commenting is equivalent to committing to a feature in the next release. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Google (not Borland) knows all ;)
    ... Dennis Landi wrote: ... > Delphi compiler, why would they be statistically unrepresentative of ... > the whole delphi population? ... - Moses Hadas ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)