Re: Cat among the pigeons......
From: William Meyer (wmeyerNO_at_SPAMsbcglobal.net)
Date: 07/20/04
- Next message: William Meyer: "Re: Cat among the pigeons......"
- Previous message: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Cat among the pigeons......"
- In reply to: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Cat among the pigeons......"
- Next in thread: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Cat among the pigeons......"
- Reply: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Cat among the pigeons......"
- Reply: Bob Dawson: "Re: Cat among the pigeons......"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 20 Jul 2004 09:13:45 -0700
On 07/20/04, Nick Hodges [TeamB] said:
> William Meyer wrote:
>
> > and lost count of the number of rationales for why it
> > "wasn't really important enough."
>
> I frankly agree with this sentiment myself.
The last one I recall had to do with the idea that if you're writing
"proper" methods, they're short enough that you don't really need
folding. One of my reasons for wanting it, and wanting it to be
persistent, is that it makes good sense to me to fold up methods that
have been fully tested, leaving open those that may need work.
-- Bill -------- "I cannot under-take to lay my finger on that article in the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on the object of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James Madison
- Next message: William Meyer: "Re: Cat among the pigeons......"
- Previous message: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Cat among the pigeons......"
- In reply to: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Cat among the pigeons......"
- Next in thread: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Cat among the pigeons......"
- Reply: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Cat among the pigeons......"
- Reply: Bob Dawson: "Re: Cat among the pigeons......"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading