Re: Question for Borland
From: Bob Dawson (RBDawson_at_prodigy.net)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: Alvaro GP: "Re: Question for Borland"
- Previous message: Eric Schreiber: "Re: Question for Borland"
- In reply to: Alvaro GP: "Re: Question for Borland"
- Next in thread: Eric Schreiber: "Re: Question for Borland"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:25:32 -0500
"Alvaro GP" wrote
> resources than necessary. Delphi 9 falls in this category, since it could
> have been divided into "Delphi 9" and "Delphi 9 for .NET", thus keeping
each
> requirements in their respective place.
But failing to meet my wish to have a single, multi-target IDE. It still
comes down to calling bloat just means you don't want it or think you need
it.
bobD
- Next message: Alvaro GP: "Re: Question for Borland"
- Previous message: Eric Schreiber: "Re: Question for Borland"
- In reply to: Alvaro GP: "Re: Question for Borland"
- Next in thread: Eric Schreiber: "Re: Question for Borland"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|