Re: SA question
From: Yannis (None_at_Noware.non)
Date: 09/24/04
- Next message: Rick Beerendonk: "Re: This isn't worth an official Borland warning"
- Previous message: Jim Cooper: "Re: Diamond back refactoring (again, I know...)"
- In reply to: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: SA question"
- Next in thread: Leroy Casterline: "Re: SA question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 24 Sep 2004 01:02:15 -0700
"Will DeWitt Jr." <edge@NOSPAM.icehouse.net> wrote in
news:4152e06a@newsgroups.borland.com:
> Remember, the minimum SA cost is $1000 _now_, so it's now totally
> useless for Pro SKU users (unless you actually buy multiple licenses,
> but for the small-time developer, I don't even know why they offer it,
> it's bordering on an insult), but you can adjust the quantity of SA
> and you should be able to see how much SA costs for the product by
> performing division on the value once it exceeds $1000
> (TotalForLineItem div Quantity).
To be fare, is this limitation for the upgrade as well??
Regards.
-- Yannis Kozikopoulos Software Engineer Market Data & Analysis ------------------------------------------------------ PROFILE S. A. Sigrou Av 199, 171 21 Athens Phone: +30 210 9301200, Fax: +30 2109301222 e-mail: ********************** www.profile.gr
- Next message: Rick Beerendonk: "Re: This isn't worth an official Borland warning"
- Previous message: Jim Cooper: "Re: Diamond back refactoring (again, I know...)"
- In reply to: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: SA question"
- Next in thread: Leroy Casterline: "Re: SA question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]