Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed...
From: Joanna Carter \(TeamB\) (joannac_at_btinternetxx.com)
Date: 10/04/04
- Next message: Dennis Landi: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Previous message: Jim Cooper: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- In reply to: Dennis Landi: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Next in thread: Dennis Landi: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Reply: Dennis Landi: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Reply: Dennis Landi: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Reply: Dennis Landi: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Reply: Mike Swaim: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Reply: Mike Swaim: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 11:58:29 -0500
"Dennis Landi" <nada@nada.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
41617b94$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
I notice you haven't bothered to answer any of my questions. Are you really
interested in discussion or simply scoring points?
> Do you continue to stand by your repeated statements that Win32 api will
be
> an emulation layer on top of .NET? And do you continue to stand by your
> testimony that this information is "straight from the horse's mouth" at
MS?
Yes, I do. How do you think you are going to get at the new .NET
functionality that is native to the drivers without having a wrapper layer,
however implemented??
The issue is not existing Win32 functionality, it is OS functionality that
will be added in the future.
e.g.
1. The NTFS file system *is* going to be superceded by WinFS which only has
a managed .NET API. Unless M$ write a backwards-compatible layer that
emulates the NTFS file system, how do you think you are going to talk to
it???
2. The new Avalon UI framework is already being written in C# managed code.
How do you think you are going to be able to talk to that from Win32 without
a wrapper layer???
If you have an OS whose file system and UI are both written in managed .NET
code, just how do you think M$ are going to achieve backwards
compatibility??
Answers please.
Joanna
-- Joanna Carter (TeamB) Consultant Software Engineer TeamBUG support for UK-BUG TeamMM support for ModelMaker
- Next message: Dennis Landi: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Previous message: Jim Cooper: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- In reply to: Dennis Landi: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Next in thread: Dennis Landi: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Reply: Dennis Landi: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Reply: Dennis Landi: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Reply: Dennis Landi: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Reply: Mike Swaim: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Reply: Mike Swaim: "Re: Actually I am a little bit disappointed..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|