Re: Am I paying for the same components in Delphi 2005 that I paid for in Delphi 1 and 2?

From: Derek Davidson (derek.davidson_at_gmail.com)
Date: 10/31/04


Date: 31 Oct 2004 10:02:07 -0700

Joanna Carter (TeamB) wrote:

> If you feel that your comments are justified, then please quote the
> sentences that imply them, together with your reasons for your
> assumptions.

Joanna, he already did.
 
> I simply asked those who are constantly complaining about Borland's
> strategies in these newsgroups to either do something useful or quit
> getting on other people's nerves by whinging about it in these
> groups, where you have more chance of flying to Venus than you do of
> influencing the people who really hold the pursestrings at Borland.

Then what is this newsgroup for? Sunshine? The utterly trite 'Having
a great Delphi day' garbage spewed recently? Good news *only*? That's
not a newsgroup - that's propaganda and there's way too much of that
here already.

> These groups are paid for by Borland ....

Let's face it, it ain't costing a fortune (at all) and they get FREE
support for their products out of it. So cry me a river.

> ... and are intended for peer
> support of folks wanting to use their products.

In a non-tech newsgroup? I think not.

> It is by Borland's
> grace and TeamB's forbearance ....

Which makes it all sound like the customer gets in the way. Can you not
see this?

> that you are allowed to continue biting
> the hand that feeds you;

ROTFLMAO!

> we could easily cancel every negative post
> as 'not being in Borland's interest', but we don't because we know
> that there are problems that need raising and addressing.

Wait a minute. Seems to me you're contradicting yourself now. Unless
of course you're demanding postings should be made along the lines of
"Oh great Borland, we the unworthy have the terrible responsibility of
informing you that due to our unreasonable coding efforts we have
discovered a lack of optimization in a part of your product <wibble>"

> However
> continuing to insist that you know how to run the company better than
> they do without providing evidence to that assertion simply clogs up
> these groups and hinders those who want answers to genuine problems
> from finding the help they need.

You're failing to recognize that Borland themselves are showing that
THEY are unable to run the company. After that, anyone else has a
better chance.

You want people to blow sunshine up your a**? Give them something to
priase. You want people to provide constructive criticism? Give them
an environment that encourages it. You want people to buy Borland?
Give them something worth investing their money in.

So Borland's customers aren't happy. Suck it up. Better still, do
something positive about it instead of blaming customers.

While Borland continue to perform the way they are and blame everyone
else for their problems, you'll always get a queue of Monday morning
quarter-backs ready to tell them how it should be done. You don't like
that? Then either get out of the business or *win*.

No-one said business was easy.

-- 
Derek Davidson
http://www.ebsms.com
Send SMS Text messages from your PC. For FREE!


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Delphi for .NET and Win32
    ... We may not be representative of all your customers, ... the most passionate among them. ... >newsgroup) will be extremely happy with what Borland is offering. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: [64-bit] optimism
    ... >>Have you told Borland that? ... This sort of feedback from their customers ... > I assume that this newsgroup is the right channel, ... Developer Relations is the right channel. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Stop the negativism!
    ... We've heard this for a few years from Borland, ... told that it's strange that they are not doing what their customers ... Download Counters data has covered all countries Borland does ... The number of registrations since Delphi 2005 does not give them ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: D8 manuals - RIP ?
    ... > misunderstanding by Borland of who their customers are (see that Pulse ... > poll on BDN that indicates BDN participants want printed manuals more ... You have to manage the contract with the printers. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Go, software activation, go!
    ... since honest people and serious customers would ... enforced, it should be bullet proof and absolutely reliable, to avoid ... Borland ever fails to allow legally entitled people to maintain access to ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)