Re: Software Assurance

From: John Kaster (Borland) (johnk_at_borland.com)
Date: 11/15/04 

Date: 15 Nov 2004 07:25:24 -0700

Rich Walker in <iotep057cv1vb3rf862egie1rqr7c93uuu@4ax.com> wrote:
> can remove if you don't want it for some reason). The problem is that
> there is no information that I can find anywhere on Borland's website
> that explains what Software Assurance is.

Agreed. 

-- 
John Kaster http://blogs.borland.com/johnk
BorCon2004, all info in one place! http://info.borland.com/conf2004
Features and bugs: http://qc.borland.com 
Get source: http://cc.borland.com
What's going on? http://ec.borland.com/ec/index.faces

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Access 2000 to 2002 - What do I watch for?
    ... Since 2002 had effectively no new bugs or features, ... easy to imagine that the only reason there was a new 'version' ...
    (microsoft.public.access.security)
  • Re: Is it possible to get an update 4 for D2005 ?
    ... > Is this reason for AR to be in QC? ... John Kaster http://blogs.borland.com/johnk ... Features and bugs: http://qc.borland.com ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Build a better mousetrap ...
    ... features--while installing bugs in the new version's features ... ... "The reason we come up with new versions is not to ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Delphi2005 BETA
    ... Lauchlan M wrote: ... > there for some reason or other. ... John Kaster http://blogs.borland.com/johnk Features and bugs: http://qc.borland.com Get source: http://cc.borland.com If it's not here, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: How can I upgrade Office 2002 SP 3 to Office 2007 and keep both versions?
    ... features is confusing and takes up space that I'd rather use as my ... well -- and my issue is that the arrangement of the features gives me grief ... and your existing Office Suite is better than the ... I hate to rag on Office '07, but I've found no good reason to migrate to ...
    (microsoft.public.office.setup)