Re: Chrome - competition for Borland?
From: Dan Palley (dan_at_trams.com)
Date: 11/17/04
- Next message: JED: "Re: The 64-bit Samba was Re: Chrome - competition for Borland?"
- Previous message: John Herbster: "Re: Moaning: registering Delphi 7"
- Maybe in reply to: Arthur Hoornweg: "Chrome - competition for Borland?"
- Next in thread: Captain Jake: "Re: Chrome - competition for Borland?"
- Reply: Captain Jake: "Re: Chrome - competition for Borland?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:07:59 -0800
"Captain Jake" <jake[nospam]@jsnewsreader.com> wrote in message
news:419a8f14$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> "Mike Swaim" <mswaim@odin.mdacc.tmc.edu> wrote in message
> news:419a71e8$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> > Well, there was the minor matter that the 68000 didn't have a MMU.
>
> I thought none of them had one built onto the chip itself until much
later?
> Wasn't this the only real difference between the 80386 and 80486 for
> example?
>
> Or am I misunderstanding what MMU stands for?
The 80386 had a full MMU. What it didn't have (and what the 80486 added)
was an integrated floating point unit (FPU).
Dan
- Next message: JED: "Re: The 64-bit Samba was Re: Chrome - competition for Borland?"
- Previous message: John Herbster: "Re: Moaning: registering Delphi 7"
- Maybe in reply to: Arthur Hoornweg: "Chrome - competition for Borland?"
- Next in thread: Captain Jake: "Re: Chrome - competition for Borland?"
- Reply: Captain Jake: "Re: Chrome - competition for Borland?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
