Re: Delphi 2005 Pro - Converting a D7 Project to it... (long!)

From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] (velthuis_at_gmail.com)
Date: 12/12/04 

Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 20:42:32 +0100

Derek Davidson wrote:

> Lord Crc wrote:
>
> > Some reasons why ....
>
> There are thousands of reasons not to do something.

He only showed why the PCPlus/Borland comparison is invalid.

As always, this is probably a ROI problem again. If the investment is
too high, or the expected benefits are too low, they will probably not
do it. 

-- 
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
"If you can count your money, you don't have a billion dollars."
    - J. Paul Getty (1892-1976)

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Godels note 48a
    ... godels proof is invalid for 5 reasons ... theorems are invalid for 5 reasons: he uses the axiom of reducibility- ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: How to update multiple rows atomically
    ... Having only MySQL to test against is like having brain damange. ... invalid for reasons having nothing to do with the experiment. ...
    (comp.databases.theory)
  • Re: comparing chars stored in integers to single character strings
    ... >>Both forms are invalid for different reasons. ... > It can be a valid statement. ... > because comparison operators can be overloaded with any desired ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Godels
    ... godels proof is invalid for 5 reasons ... theorems are invalid for 5 reasons: he uses the axiom of reducibility- ... which is invalid, he uses the axiom of choice, he constructs impredicative ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Registering D2005
    ... "Derek Davidson" wrote in message ... >> They also pointed out that many of Borland customers have been asking ... why his claim is invalid. ... Dan Miser ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)