Re: from Danny's chat - 11/19
From: Captain Jake (jake[nospam)
Date: 12/21/04
- Next message: Marc Rohloff [TeamB]: "Re: .NET and Interbase"
- Previous message: JED: "Re: Delphi 2005 and missing component equivalents for VS"
- Next in thread: OBones: "Re: from Danny's chat - 11/19"
- Reply: OBones: "Re: from Danny's chat - 11/19"
- Reply: Hallvard Vassbotn: "Re: from Danny's chat - 11/19"
- Reply: Kevin Berry: "Re: from Danny's chat - 11/19"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 19:22:54 -0600
Brad White <> wrote in message <41c764fc@newsgroups.borland.com>
> http://bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,32789,00.html
> > "Any plans to include Design by Contract in the Delphi language?" - answered
>
> I don't see anywhere that it was answered.
> What does this mean?
I may be wrong, but I seem to remember the answer being "not at this time".
Design by contract results in a nice clean syntax when it is built into the
language, but it isn't anything you can not implement using asserts. I can
think of a lot of other things on which I would prefer the Delphi team spend
their time.
-- ***Free Your Mind*** Posted with JSNewsreader-BETA 0.9.4.361
- Next message: Marc Rohloff [TeamB]: "Re: .NET and Interbase"
- Previous message: JED: "Re: Delphi 2005 and missing component equivalents for VS"
- Next in thread: OBones: "Re: from Danny's chat - 11/19"
- Reply: OBones: "Re: from Danny's chat - 11/19"
- Reply: Hallvard Vassbotn: "Re: from Danny's chat - 11/19"
- Reply: Kevin Berry: "Re: from Danny's chat - 11/19"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]