Re: Memory Leak with AnsiString
From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] (velthuis_at_gmail.com)
Date: 01/06/05
- Next message: Robert Brock: "Re: A Fun Poll"
- Previous message: Dave White: "Re: A Fun Poll"
- In reply to: Michael Anonymous: "Re: Memory Leak with AnsiString"
- Next in thread: Michael Anonymous: "Re: Memory Leak with AnsiString"
- Reply: Michael Anonymous: "Re: Memory Leak with AnsiString"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 01:26:55 +0100
Michael Anonymous wrote:
> I'm not sure what you are trying to say.
> What isn't necessary?
To turn the (IMO more intuitive) function into a procedure with a var
parameter.
> And what will only happen to global strings?
The odd one off for reference counts, which was what started this
thread.
-- Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] http://rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." -- Source Unknown
- Next message: Robert Brock: "Re: A Fun Poll"
- Previous message: Dave White: "Re: A Fun Poll"
- In reply to: Michael Anonymous: "Re: Memory Leak with AnsiString"
- Next in thread: Michael Anonymous: "Re: Memory Leak with AnsiString"
- Reply: Michael Anonymous: "Re: Memory Leak with AnsiString"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|