Re: A whiter Delphi
From: Captain Jake (jake[nospam)
Date: 01/29/05
- Next message: Captain Jake: "Re: A whiter Delphi"
- Previous message: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: upbeat PC Pro review on Delphi 2005"
- In reply to: Kevin Boswell: "Re: A whiter Delphi"
- Next in thread: Kevin Boswell: "Re: A whiter Delphi"
- Reply: Kevin Boswell: "Re: A whiter Delphi"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:17:15 -0600
Kevin Boswell <kevin@legendsoft.com> wrote in message
<41fba5be@newsgroups.borland.com>
> it does appear that the Borland resources being spent on the Galileo IDE
> would be better spent on the language itself, rather than playing catchup in
> the IDE arena to a better funded and focused VS.
Well, there are some non-trivial things that the BDS 3 IDE can do that VS can
not, so I don't know if the term "catch up" is really accurate here. In any
event, I think Julian is all wet on this topic. Languages, including Object
Pascal, are good enough. Future improvements, while nice, are probably beyond
the point of diminishing returns.
-- ***Free Your Mind*** Posted with JSNewsreader-BETA 0.9.4.372
- Next message: Captain Jake: "Re: A whiter Delphi"
- Previous message: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: upbeat PC Pro review on Delphi 2005"
- In reply to: Kevin Boswell: "Re: A whiter Delphi"
- Next in thread: Kevin Boswell: "Re: A whiter Delphi"
- Reply: Kevin Boswell: "Re: A whiter Delphi"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading