Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
From: Dennis Landi (nada_at_nada.com)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: VT Venkatesh: "Re: upbeat PC Pro review on Delphi 2005"
- Previous message: Matthew Mead: "Re: PAS to HTML"
- In reply to: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Next in thread: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Reply: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Reply: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:08:35 -0500
"Wayne Niddery [TeamB]" <wniddery@chaffaci.on.ca> wrote in message
news:41fc2d69$1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> Dennis Landi wrote:
> >
> > Can you show me any documentation that security has ever been a
> > problem with natively compiler Delphi applications?
>
> I never said anything about Delphi specifically here.
Then lets clarify your stance on win32 delphi apps. Do you have any
evidence that Win32 Delphi Apps are insecure; and that they need to be
scrapped in favour of a more secure .NET application?
If you don't, then .NET is a product without a market, at least among the
natively compiled delphi customer base. We don't need to go to .NET just to
make our apps secure. They already are.
-d
- Next message: VT Venkatesh: "Re: upbeat PC Pro review on Delphi 2005"
- Previous message: Matthew Mead: "Re: PAS to HTML"
- In reply to: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Next in thread: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Reply: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Reply: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]