Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
From: Will DeWitt Jr. (edge_at_NOSPAM.icehouse.net)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: John Kaster (Borland): "Re: PAS to HTML"
- Previous message: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Windows XP Professional x64 Edition ---> Delphi 2005 x64 Edition?"
- In reply to: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Next in thread: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Reply: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Reply: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 29 Jan 2005 23:04:56 -0800
Nick Hodges [TeamB] wrote:
> Running that natively compiled application on my system would cause
> all sorts of problems.
Clearly, you've never heard of Windows File Protection.
Will
-- Want native support in Delphi for AMD64/EM64T? Vote here-- http://qc.borland.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=7324
- Next message: John Kaster (Borland): "Re: PAS to HTML"
- Previous message: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Windows XP Professional x64 Edition ---> Delphi 2005 x64 Edition?"
- In reply to: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Next in thread: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Reply: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Reply: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
