Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland
From: Bruce McGee (bmcgee_at_glooscap.com)
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: Erwin van den Bosch: "Any news of a release date of service pack 2 (or 3:-) for Delphi2005?"
- Previous message: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- In reply to: Eyal: "Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland"
- Next in thread: Eyal: "Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland"
- Reply: Eyal: "Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 31 Jan 2005 04:40:39 -0800
Eyal wrote:
[...]
> Further, I can't really trust that applications that I compile with
> D2005 (for Win32), will really run without a problem on Win32
> machines that don't have .NET installed.
>
> But, you'll say, Borland clearly states that Win32 apps compiled with
> D2005 will run just fine without .NET run-time.
[...]
This is a pretty misleading statement. I can confirm from experience
that D2005 Win32 applications run properly on Win32 machines that don't
have .Net installed.
For what it's worth, I agree that we should still be able to buy legal
licenses for previous versions of Delphi. I'm not sure about the
logistics or how far back it should go, but I think being able to buy
Delphi 7 makes sense.
-- Regards, Bruce McGee Glooscap Software
- Next message: Erwin van den Bosch: "Any news of a release date of service pack 2 (or 3:-) for Delphi2005?"
- Previous message: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- In reply to: Eyal: "Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland"
- Next in thread: Eyal: "Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland"
- Reply: Eyal: "Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|