The Galileo IDE
From: Kristofer Skaug (ya.ierfgnf_at_thnxf.x)
Date: 01/13/05
- Next message: Kirk Halgren: "Re: Two Books Left"
- Previous message: Don Strenczewilk: "Re: What newsgroup to use?"
- Next in thread: Iman L Crawford: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Reply: Iman L Crawford: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Reply: Kevin Berry: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: JED: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Reply: Andrew: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: David Clegg: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Reply: TJC Support: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Reply: Atmapuri: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Dave Nottage [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:17:42 +0100
The fact that Borland has now been working on the Galileo (ex-SideWinder)
IDE for more than 2 years and through 3 major product releases, while it
still - after D2005 Sp1 - seems to be every bit as unstable and resource
hogging (slow) as D8 was, strongly suggests to me that there's a
fundamental design flaw nested in there somewhere.
It is symptomatic that the D2005 IDE immiediately sent people chasing
ways to "strip-down" the IDE. When I first saw JED's "DCM" tool I thought
it was for selecting installed Component packages. But no, it has become
a popular tool for customising the basic IDE installation to get rid of
any and all unwanted/unneeded packages, not only because they hog
resources but also because they're buggy and blow big holes in people's
productivity.
This situation smells of so much desperation, never came across it on
such a scale for any previous Delphi release.
The other big question is, how can Borland have signed off such a buggy
product? The AV's are not just here and there, they're everywhere. It's
really embarrassing, as if it were a beta of its kind, and SP1 doesn't
seem to have improved things enough by far. Borland, don't expect to see
my company's 5-Pro-licenses order for D2005 before a generally applauded
SP2 is out.
-- Kristofer
- Next message: Kirk Halgren: "Re: Two Books Left"
- Previous message: Don Strenczewilk: "Re: What newsgroup to use?"
- Next in thread: Iman L Crawford: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Reply: Iman L Crawford: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Reply: Kevin Berry: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: JED: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Reply: Andrew: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Nick Hodges [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: David Clegg: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Reply: TJC Support: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Reply: Atmapuri: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Craig Stuntz [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Maybe reply: Dave Nottage [TeamB]: "Re: The Galileo IDE"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|