Re: Unicode VCL. Why has this been ignored?
From: Abdullah Kauchali (non_at_non.com)
Date: 01/18/05
- Next message: Steve Williams: "Re: Debugger hanging"
- Previous message: Abdullah Kauchali: "Re: Unicode VCL. Why has this been ignored?"
- In reply to: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]: "Re: Unicode VCL. Why has this been ignored?"
- Next in thread: Jim Cooper: "Re: Unicode VCL. Why has this been ignored?"
- Reply: Jim Cooper: "Re: Unicode VCL. Why has this been ignored?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:35:50 +0200
Wayne Niddery [TeamB] wrote:
> My understanding is that SQL Server will *host* .Net. Essentially
SQL Server
> is rising to OS status, or very close to it - for example it will be
> responsible for serving up the memory allocation requests of .Net.
That is my understanding too. (But then I also stand to be corrected
by some rhetorical pseudo-Zen comeback from an opposing viewpoint!) :)
Claiming that SQL Server (Yukon) is written in .NET just because of this
feature, is like making a similar one about Oracle written in Java
*because* it sports a JVM to execute procedural syntax against its
core engine.
True?
- Next message: Steve Williams: "Re: Debugger hanging"
- Previous message: Abdullah Kauchali: "Re: Unicode VCL. Why has this been ignored?"
- In reply to: Wayne Niddery [TeamB]: "Re: Unicode VCL. Why has this been ignored?"
- Next in thread: Jim Cooper: "Re: Unicode VCL. Why has this been ignored?"
- Reply: Jim Cooper: "Re: Unicode VCL. Why has this been ignored?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|