Re: Borland is neglecting Delphi for Win32 badly
From: Captain Jake (jake[nospam)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: Abdullah Kauchali: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Previous message: Dennis Landi: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- In reply to: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Borland is neglecting Delphi for Win32 badly"
- Next in thread: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Borland is neglecting Delphi for Win32 badly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:11:15 -0600
"Will DeWitt Jr." <edge@NOSPAM.icehouse.net> wrote in message
<41f231b9$1@newsgroups.borland.com>
> It's *wrong* to be told
> that you can't discuss things pertinent to you simply because someone
> in TeamB doesn't like it.
Ah, this whole topic was an excellent excuse to test/verify pair plonking.
Now I can read Will's posts to others without seeing the Rudy-Will War.
-- ***Free Your Mind*** Posted with JSNewsreader-BETA 0.9.4.369
- Next message: Abdullah Kauchali: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Previous message: Dennis Landi: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- In reply to: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Borland is neglecting Delphi for Win32 badly"
- Next in thread: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: Borland is neglecting Delphi for Win32 badly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|