Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
From: Abdullah Kauchali (non_at_non.com)
Date: 01/22/05
- Next message: Deborah Pate (TeamB): "Re: My post has been canceled"
- Previous message: Captain Jake: "Re: Borland is neglecting Delphi for Win32 badly"
- In reply to: Dennis Landi: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Next in thread: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:08:47 +0200
Dennis Landi wrote:
Great!
>> 3) On the AMD64, thats supports the running of bot 32-bit and 64-bit
>> code, would we be able to call unmanaged 32-bit DLLs from a 64-bit
>> .NET assembly? (Sometimes its not practical/possible to recompile
>> /port the 32-bit DLL).
"No. You will have to use any of the supported IPC mechanisms like named
pipes, sockets, memory mapped files, COM. There is no type of thunk on
64-bit version of Windows that will allow 64-bit user mode code to call
32-bit user mode code in the same process."
The same is said in the AMD faq.
- Next message: Deborah Pate (TeamB): "Re: My post has been canceled"
- Previous message: Captain Jake: "Re: Borland is neglecting Delphi for Win32 badly"
- In reply to: Dennis Landi: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Next in thread: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
