Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] (velthuis_at_gmail.com)
Date: 01/24/05
- Next message: David Clegg: "Re: Message expiration!"
- Previous message: Paul Qualls: "Re: y 1/2 staff?"
- In reply to: Abdullah Kauchali: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Next in thread: Abdullah Kauchali: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Reply: Abdullah Kauchali: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:34:39 +0100
Abdullah Kauchali wrote:
> Wayne Niddery [TeamB] wrote:
>
> > Where has Borland stated that it is the exclusive platform for them
> > or anyone else?
>
> For Delphi developers, the only 64 bit alternative is .NET. Wayne,
> please tell me I am wrong.
Currently, that is true.
But that does not answer what Wayne asked, does it? Where does Borland
say it sees .NET as the only platform for the future? I'd guess it all
depends on the (expected) ubiquity of Win64.
-- Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] http://rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds, and the pessimist fears this is true." - James Branch Cabell
- Next message: David Clegg: "Re: Message expiration!"
- Previous message: Paul Qualls: "Re: y 1/2 staff?"
- In reply to: Abdullah Kauchali: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Next in thread: Abdullah Kauchali: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Reply: Abdullah Kauchali: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]