Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland
From: Wayne Davis (sapm_at_drillmasters.com)
Date: 01/27/05
- Next message: QHenrick_Hellstr=F6m_=5BStreamSec=5D=22?=: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Previous message: Crazy Horse's crazier little brother: "Re: Batch file III"
- In reply to: Dave White: "Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland"
- Next in thread: Rick Carter: "Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland"
- Reply: Rick Carter: "Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:24:20 -0500
In article <41f87bfe@newsgroups.borland.com>,
daveUNDERSCOREwhite@spectrachromDOTcom says...
>
> My experience has been that Win2K is more stable than XP. We now have XP on
> almost every PC in the lab (dozesn of them) and we're seeing a lot more
> crashes with XP than we ever saw on Win2K boxes.
>
If I have my choice I'll take Win2K3, first and Win2K second.
Win2K is more stable and less annoying than XP. We have XP on a couple
laptops, but our wintel development systems are win2K3 and win2K.
- Next message: QHenrick_Hellstr=F6m_=5BStreamSec=5D=22?=: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Previous message: Crazy Horse's crazier little brother: "Re: Batch file III"
- In reply to: Dave White: "Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland"
- Next in thread: Rick Carter: "Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland"
- Reply: Rick Carter: "Re: Future of Delphi 7.x - need official word from Borland"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|