Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
From: Bob Dawson (bdawson_at_idtdna.com)
Date: 01/31/05
- Next message: Dennis Landi: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Previous message: Brion L. Webster: "Re: Basic vs. Dynamic Disks"
- In reply to: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Next in thread: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Reply: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:19:52 -0600
"Will DeWitt Jr." wrote
>
> One too many zeros, /200/ million, sorry.
>
> Will
Still not a number to sneeze at. Nevertheless, much depends on distribution
patterns.
bobD
- Next message: Dennis Landi: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Previous message: Brion L. Webster: "Re: Basic vs. Dynamic Disks"
- In reply to: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Next in thread: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Reply: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|