Re: some interesting perspectives on .NET from the other camp ...

From: Dan Barclay (Dan_at_MVPs.org)
Date: 02/13/05


Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:46:44 -0600

That would be nice, but it's certainly not necessary.

Remember, the target audience are a huge group of developers who have
"known" that there was a safe path forward in VB. What could be more safe
than the company's (world's) largest selling development environment? What
could be more safe than being in the middle of a crowd of 6MM folks who all
want the same thing? They have had major incompatibilities thrust upon
them anyway.

Borland only needs to show Language Stability. Somehow I don't think
that's hard to do. Look at the considerations/rules I think are important.

See "Standard for Language Stability" in

  http://vb.mvps.org/tips/stability.asp

Can you take core language functions and fragments (excludes i/o, api, etc),
compile them in the next version, and have them work? That's pretty much
the bottom line. It really ain't that hard, and it's nothing more than
common sense.

History matters. Promises are just the promises of marketeers.

The only hard part, in my opinion, is getting apps (and developers) to
Delphi.

Dan

"Thomas Miller" <tmiller@bss-software.com> wrote in message
news:420f93a1@newsgroups.borland.com...
> The problem is Borland would need to put out a road map to
> show how long term they would be safe with Borland. That
> would be the biggest selling point. Borland won't release
> a road map.
>
> Write once and deploy W32, W64, .Net 1, or .Net2! What a
> sales pitch!!!
>
>
>> I don't know what you or I can do beyond pointing out the opportunity and
>> explaining it.
>>
>> Later,
>> Dan
>>
>>
>
> --
> Thomas Miller
> Wash DC Delphi SIG Chairperson
> Delphi Client/Server Certified Developer
> BSS Accounting & Distribution Software
> BSS Enterprise Accounting FrameWork
>
> http://www.bss-software.com
> http://www.cpcug.org/user/delphi/index.html
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/uopl/
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/dbexpressplus



Relevant Pages

  • Re: A case for Microsoft
    ... specifically Delphi. ... set (in the meeting to make the decision, the developers' comments were ... "Borland looks like it is back on track" and "if they would stop wasting ... If you've used D2005 or D2006 and VS Studio - you know that the IDE ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Delphi Community missing the .NET-boat
    ... Just look at Enterprise developers in big fortune 500 companies. ... Borland is definitely targeting the enterprise nowadays, ... Delphi development, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: The market that is hiding in plain view?
    ... Borland has ALWAYS had this "mission" to release basic vanilla stuff and leave ... This "market" has always been here, and Delphi developers have been complaining ... business reason to start going beyond the basics in terms of what the ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Win32, Linux, .NET >> Where is this mess going to?
    ... Since D1 i am a Borland Delphi fan, but now, i am very sad and frustrated. ... many components from the excellent component developers. ... Kylix was a hope for Linux. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.thirdpartytools.general)
  • Re: What I saw at MS Launch
    ... > developers this frightened away. ... That's a potential weakness that Borland could ... Binding a grid to a collection is now REALLY easy. ... WinForms designer, and have it just display an error message. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)