Re: Revoltin' predicament
From: Liz (liz_wants_no_spam_at_xcalibur.nospam.co.uk)
Date: 02/28/05
- Next message: JohnE: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Previous message: Iman L Crawford: "Re: Borland and the Sub-Enterprise"
- In reply to: BOB-O-MATIC: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Next in thread: eshipman: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Reply: eshipman: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Reply: Kostya: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Reply: BOB-O-MATIC: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Reply: Matt Jacobs: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Reply: Sanford Aranoff: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 28 Feb 2005 13:59:01 -0800
BOB-O-MATIC wrote:
> I love Borland. No love at all for MS. But MS has Borland spread
> thinner than a boob in a mammogram.
Obviously written by someone who has no concept as to how painful that
is.
- Next message: JohnE: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Previous message: Iman L Crawford: "Re: Borland and the Sub-Enterprise"
- In reply to: BOB-O-MATIC: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Next in thread: eshipman: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Reply: eshipman: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Reply: Kostya: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Reply: BOB-O-MATIC: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Reply: Matt Jacobs: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Reply: Sanford Aranoff: "Re: Revoltin' predicament"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|