Re: Microsoft Preps for the 64-Bit Wave
From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] (velthuis_at_gmail.com)
Date: 03/01/05
- Next message: Mike Swaim: "Re: Microsoft Preps for the 64-Bit Wave"
- Previous message: John Kaster (Borland): "Re: Writing a compiler"
- Maybe in reply to: JED: "Re: Microsoft Preps for the 64-Bit Wave"
- Next in thread: Dennis Ortiz: "Re: Microsoft Preps for the 64-Bit Wave"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 00:10:24 +0100
DS wrote:
> Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:
> > Oh yes, it does.
>
> I'll get you back on this, but I need some sleep now... :)
>
> > > I pretty much doubt it. WinForms is almost legacy already and
> > > they're putting much effort into making Longhorh GUI HW
> > > accelerated (as MacOS is for some time now).
> > I don't much care about WinForms. I care about the underlying
> > runtimes, GDI+, and the rest of the FCL, which will most certainly
> > not be abandoned. And the acceleration would exactly achieve what I
> > wrote above.
>
> No way! GDI+ is going away.
It may become deprecated and superceded, but I doubt it will go away.
> I remember reading in MS personell's blogs that, albeit they will
> provide Avalon's functionality as add-in for XP and 2K3 users, it
> could not benefit from new driver model, as it is too deep embedded
> in Longhorn's core.
Could be. I'm sure .NET now is not what it will be then. The core
classes will remain, though.
-- Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] http://rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de "A low voter turnout is an indication of fewer people going to the polls." -- George W. Bush
- Next message: Mike Swaim: "Re: Microsoft Preps for the 64-Bit Wave"
- Previous message: John Kaster (Borland): "Re: Writing a compiler"
- Maybe in reply to: JED: "Re: Microsoft Preps for the 64-Bit Wave"
- Next in thread: Dennis Ortiz: "Re: Microsoft Preps for the 64-Bit Wave"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|