Re: Win32 and Win64
From: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] (velthuis_at_gmail.com)
Date: 03/04/05
- Next message: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: [64-bit Delphi] A msg from Hairy (van Tassel)"
- Previous message: John Kaster (Borland): "Re: Microsoft Preps for the 64-Bit Wave"
- In reply to: somebody: "Re: Win32 and Win64"
- Next in thread: John Kaster (Borland): "Re: Win32 and Win64"
- Reply: John Kaster (Borland): "Re: Win32 and Win64"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:31:15 +0100
somebody wrote:
> "Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]" <velthuis@gmail.com> wrote
>
> > I think this may be an interesting read for the Win32/Win64 native
> > supporters. I found some of the facts mentioned quite surprising.
> >
> > http://blogs.borland.com/abauer/archive/2005/03/03/2841.aspx
>
> This was recently posted and induced a long discussion about pointers.
> Bottomline is, with 64 bit, one's code is obviously more wasteful.
Only that was posted, and came originally from Herb Sutter (C++ guru
working for Borland). This seems to have a different message as well.
-- Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] http://rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de "Everything has been figured out, except how to live." - Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980)
- Next message: Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]: "Re: [64-bit Delphi] A msg from Hairy (van Tassel)"
- Previous message: John Kaster (Borland): "Re: Microsoft Preps for the 64-Bit Wave"
- In reply to: somebody: "Re: Win32 and Win64"
- Next in thread: John Kaster (Borland): "Re: Win32 and Win64"
- Reply: John Kaster (Borland): "Re: Win32 and Win64"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|