Re: Why no language improvements?
From: Nick Hodges [TeamB] (nickhodges_at_gmail.com)
Date: 03/08/05
- Next message: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: An interesting article"
- Previous message: QHenrick_Hellstr=F6m_=5BStreamSec=5D=22?=: "Re: 64 bit performance"
- In reply to: Mike Margerum: "Re: Why no language improvements?"
- Next in thread: Alisdair Meredith: "Re: Why no language improvements?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 8 Mar 2005 07:19:04 -0800
Mike Margerum wrote:
> If you want to split hairs here yes delphi has evolved (not much) and
> most certainly not the way I want it.
Well, I'm not splitting hairs, I'm pointing out a major difference. To
argue that Delphi hasn't evolved much is to ignore a very long list of
additions to the language.
-- Nick Hodges -- TeamB Lemanix Corporation -- http://www.lemanix.com Read my Blog -- http://www.lemanix.com/nick
- Next message: Will DeWitt Jr.: "Re: An interesting article"
- Previous message: QHenrick_Hellstr=F6m_=5BStreamSec=5D=22?=: "Re: 64 bit performance"
- In reply to: Mike Margerum: "Re: Why no language improvements?"
- Next in thread: Alisdair Meredith: "Re: Why no language improvements?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading