Re: Language Features I'd Like To See
From: Kyle A. Miller (kyle#REMOVE_at_millerdevelopment.info)
Date: 03/11/05
- Next message: Liz: "Re: Update 2 available"
- Previous message: Liz: "Re: Update 2 available"
- In reply to: Don Strenczewilk: "Re: Language Features I'd Like To See"
- Next in thread: John Kaster (Borland): "Re: Language Features I'd Like To See"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:03:41 -0600
Don Strenczewilk wrote:
> Well yeah, there should be a rule that no stored proc or trigger should be
> allowed to call another stored proc. Makes things a lot simpler. :)
Our application has stored procedures calling other stored procedures.
This allows customers to write their own custom code separate of our
own. For example, we might have a procedure called DoCalcs which will
call a stored procedure called DoCustomCalcs at the end of its
execution. Gives the customers a sandbox to play in without affecting
the core product.
- Next message: Liz: "Re: Update 2 available"
- Previous message: Liz: "Re: Update 2 available"
- In reply to: Don Strenczewilk: "Re: Language Features I'd Like To See"
- Next in thread: John Kaster (Borland): "Re: Language Features I'd Like To See"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|